Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Montfortanenlaan 71
Terraced house at Montfortanenlaan 71 in Tilburg (Het Zand Noord-West neighbourhood). The home was built in 1964 and has 123 m² of living space, a 180 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Tilburg Universiteit (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Antares (496 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)30 Jun 2026
- Under offer23 Jun 2026
- Price reduced10 Jun 2026€ 375,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 395,000
Property details
- Living area
- 123 m²
- Plot
- 180 m²
- Construction year
- 1964
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 376,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Het Zand Noord-West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby16
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.8%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes65.7%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental57%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot103 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space78 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical460 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,369 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 construction plan within 500 m · 48 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 91 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
28th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
no recent test score · total 46 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 293 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 515 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
41st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
54th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 157 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 317 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
46th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
17th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.