Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Paardensprongstraat 11
Terraced house at Paardensprongstraat 11 in Utrecht (Schaakbuurt en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 108 m² of living space, a 104 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Zuilen (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is KBS Wijzer aan de Vecht (239 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted25 Jun 2026€ 525,000−€ 25,000
- For sale3 Jun 2026
- Off funda27 May 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 108 m²
- Plot
- 104 m²
- Construction year
- 1999
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 566,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schaakbuurt en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant324,115 i.e.
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress49 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby11
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.9%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated175 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions16 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space59 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)72 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical490 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,116 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
31st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
63rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 358 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
82nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 523 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 185 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 168 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
39th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
11th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 142 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 61 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.