Price drops in and around Den Bosch
More homes in and around Den Bosch whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Pedro Cabralstraat 91
Apartment at Pedro Cabralstraat 91 in 's-Hertogenbosch (De Schutskamp neighbourhood). The home was built in 1967 and has 70 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is 's-Hertogenbosch (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is ATO, jenaplan kindcentrum De Ontdekking (254 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer25 Jun 2026
- Price reduced23 Jun 2026€ 300,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 310,000
Property details
- Living area
- 70 m²
- Construction year
- 1967
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 291,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Schutskamp, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Very nearby (within risk contour)245 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.8%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby9
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,641 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average32%
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.3%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.962 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away39.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)29.4 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 337 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
38th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 89 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
48th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 358 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
8th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
29th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 177 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 556 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
70th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 402 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 169 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
58th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 332 exam candidates
22nd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 331 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 83 exam candidates
22nd percentile — low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO · 144 exam candidates
58th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 382 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.