Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Prinses Beatrixlaan 419
Apartment at Prinses Beatrixlaan 419 in Rijswijk (Kleurenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1975 and has 114 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (847 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Piramide (571 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)3 Jul 2026
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 360,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 114 m²
- Construction year
- 1975
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 364,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kleurenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.1%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity21
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.2
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated245 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share22.3%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High17%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot8,160 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)171 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.939 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away38.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)43.3 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 21 construction plans within 500 m · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
58th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 89 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
96th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 139 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.