Price drops in and around Aalsmeer
More homes in and around Aalsmeer whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Punterstraat 9
Apartment at Punterstraat 9 in Aalsmeer (Centrum neighbourhood). The home was built in 2009 and has 31 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A++++. The nearest railway station is Hoofddorp (4.3 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Samen Een (152 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 425,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale19 Jun 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 31 m²
- Construction year
- 2009
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A++++
- WOZ value
- € 173,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Centrum, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.5 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place3.26 ratio
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.6 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- Severe flight nuisance26.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)70,635 m²
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-17.4 mm/yr
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 2
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 570,000
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site0.8 km
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Nearby483 m
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- Greenhouse nearby (<500 m), possible light or noise nuisance483 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away4.9 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated2%
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot612 m²
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy105%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions-1 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)-5 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA++++
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.649 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away15.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)15.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
43rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
64th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 423 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
46th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 599 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 70 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 18% of schools
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 395 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 131 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 6% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 92 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 39% of schools
63rd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
59th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.