Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Wolbrantskerkweg 201 A
Apartment at Wolbrantskerkweg 201A in Amsterdam (Botteskerkbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 78 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Lelylaan (2.5 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool De Johannes (381 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jul 2026β¬ 425,000ββ¬ 25,000
- Listed for sale23 Jun 2026β¬ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 78 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- β¬ 418,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold end date: 15-03-2058)
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Botteskerkbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty10.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated180 persons
- Liveability class
- Poorgrossly inadequate
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.3488 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2464 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1404 score
- Net labour participation
- Low60%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental66%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.3 km
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)10%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)70.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)63.6%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure11
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Within PR 10β»βΆ risk contour
- Within risk contourYes
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels3%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average⬠575,000
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)10 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby6 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Many greenhouses (possible light nuisance)16,053 mΒ²
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facility
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.87 Β΅g/kg
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,008 mΒ²
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy82%
- Calculated COβ emissions
- Low emissions4 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)20 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOβ
- Very low0.746 Β΅g/mΒ³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits Β· 5 construction plans within 500 m Β· 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
11th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 21 pupils Β· total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
10th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 33 pupils Β· total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
41st percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 38 pupils Β· total 314 pupils
Disadvantage score 50: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
43rd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
17th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
50th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 67 pupils Β· total 418 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
2nd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
34th percentile: average Β· DIA Β· grade 8: 19 pupils Β· total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
13th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 54 pupils Β· total 333 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
23rd percentile: low Β· DIA Β· grade 8: 46 pupils Β· total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 8% of schools
3rd percentile: low Β· 75% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 299 exam candidates
78th percentile: high Β· 98% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO Β· 58 exam candidates
56th percentile: average Β· 94% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 97 exam candidates
5th percentile: low Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 138 exam candidates
66th percentile: average Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 68 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO
35th percentile: average Β· 93% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO Β· 93 exam candidates
0th percentile: low Β· 59% passed Β· CE avg 5.6 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 29 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.