Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Sir Winston Churchillln 270
Apartment at Sir Winston Churchilllaan 270 in Rijswijk (Rembrandtkwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1954 and has 115 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool 't Prisma (146 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer15 Jul 2026
- Price reduced19 Jun 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 115 m²
- Construction year
- 1954
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 390,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rembrandtkwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable12%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.3%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity49
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,471 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)189 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.876 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away37.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)43.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits · 49 construction plans within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 607 pupils
Disadvantage score 125 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 217 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
7th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
44th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.