Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29/07/2026 | St.-Willibrordusstraat 5 Utrecht | € 335.000 € 310.000 | -7.5% | 47 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Prinses Margrietstraat 44 BS Utrecht | € 475.000 € 450.000 | -5.3% | 83 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Goedestraat 120 BS Utrecht | € 649.000 € 575.000 | -11.4% | 118 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | De Milan Viscontilaan 3 De Meern | € 795.000 € 750.000 | -5.7% | 154 m²294 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Amsterdamsestraatweg 180 Utrecht | € 565.000 € 540.000 | -4.4% | 117 m²55 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Buitenweg 269 Maarssen | € 869.000 € 839.000 | -3.5% | 136 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Kanaalweg 81 Utrecht | € 825.000 € 650.000 | -21.2% | 101 m²325 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Reigerskamp 219 Maarssen | € 515.000 € 495.000 | -3.9% | 130 m²132 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Bielalaan 2 Bilthoven | € 545.000 € 525.000 | -3.7% | 118 m²152 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Bing Crosbypad 10 Utrecht | € 545.000 € 525.000 | -3.7% | 107 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Wageningseberg 164 Utrecht | € 495.000 € 465.000 | -6.1% | 77 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 37 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 41 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 47 Harmelen | € 381.000 € 320.000 | -16.0% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 39 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 49 Harmelen | € 372.000 € 320.000 | -14.0% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 43 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 45 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 51 Harmelen | € 380.000 € 320.000 | -15.8% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Nieuwe Pijlsweerdstraat 75 Utrecht | € 462.500 € 420.000 | -9.2% | 70 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
St.-Willibrordusstraat 5
Terraced house at St.-Willibrordusstraat 5 in Utrecht (Elinkwijk en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 1926 and has 45 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Zuilen (684 m). The nearest primary school is KBS Ludger (63 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jul 2026€ 310,000−€ 25,000
- Under offer26 Jun 2026
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 335,000
Property details
- Living area
- 45 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1926
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 365,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Elinkwijk en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated95 persons
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)ⓘ
- Low (bottom quarter)16%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.1%
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Very large treatment plant324,115 i.e.
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby13
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside34.3%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors33.2%
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Energy labelⓘ
- UneconomicalE
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 548,000
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power lineⓘ
- Near high-voltage line81 m
- Distance to wind farm in developmentⓘ
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)1.4 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance6.6%
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Heavy train noise2.3%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10.6 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Generous plot499 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space70 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,865 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)ⓘ
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.671 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
16th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
31st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 42: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
63rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
57th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 32: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
82nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 523 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 56% of schools
33rd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 185 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
5th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 168 pupils
Disadvantage score 78: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
7th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 358 pupils
Disadvantage score 103: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
39th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
21st percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
11th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 142 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
23rd percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 258 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.