Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Steenvoordelaan 345
Apartment at Steenvoordelaan 345 in Rijswijk (Artiestenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1964 and has 78 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (334 m). The nearest primary school is CBS Melodie (416 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)14 Jul 2026
- Under offer3 Jul 2026
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 299,500−€ 25,500
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 78 m²
- Construction year
- 1964
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 301,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Artiestenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance11.5%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.5%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High19.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,091 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average31%
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical610 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.939 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away38 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)42.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits · 9 construction plans within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
58th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 722 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 89 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.