Price drops in and around Beverwijk
More homes in and around Beverwijk whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/07/2026 | Kapzaag 12 Zaandam | € 400.000 € 365.000 | -8.8% | 90 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Luceberthof 3 Heemskerk | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 78 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Vlietsend 49 L Krommenie | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 49 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Zuideinde 11 Wormerveer | € 1.150.000 € 995.000 | -13.5% | 231 m²481 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Dokter De Liefdestraat 9 Haarlem | € 435.000 € 415.000 | -4.6% | 74 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Weiver 35 Krommenie | € 425.000 € 399.000 | -6.1% | 94 m²335 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Heereweg 72 Castricum | € 850.000 € 800.000 | -5.9% | 176 m²625 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Meerstraat 12 B Beverwijk | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 147 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | De Lumeystraat 40 IJmuiden | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 152 m²188 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Laan der Nederlanden 66 A Beverwijk | € 422.500 € 400.000 | -5.3% | 124 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Semarangstraat 13 Haarlem | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 93 m²84 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Ladderbeekstraat 33 Velsen-Noord | € 425.000 € 389.000 | -8.5% | 81 m²102 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Pitrus 88 Assendelft | € 699.500 € 669.500 | -4.3% | 141 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Overtoom 17 Westzaan | € 470.000 € 419.500 | -10.7% | 112 m²89 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Appartement type C 85 Assendelft | € 699.500 € 669.500 | -4.3% | 141 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Spinozahof 15 Krommenie | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 111 m²145 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Harpraam 45 Krommenie | € 625.000 € 599.000 | -4.2% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Julianaweg 59 Wijk aan Zee | € 1.295.000 € 1.275.000 | -1.5% | 229 m²1495 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Eksterlaan 124 Haarlem | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 62 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Dorpsstraat 167 Assendelft | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 87 m²370 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Stumphiusstraat 11
Terraced house at Stumphiusstraat 11 in Beverwijk (Ronde Boogaard neighbourhood). The home was built in 1933 and has 170 m² of living space, a 173 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Beverwijk (690 m). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool Bethel (493 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 599,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 625,000
Property details
- Living area
- 170 m²
- Plot
- 173 m²
- Construction year
- 1933
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 505,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ronde Boogaard, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away12.3 km
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure15
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High6.5%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby7
- In area with induced earthquakesⓘ
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High flight nuisance10.7%
- Estimated sun hours (winter)ⓘ
- Virtually no winter sun0 hour
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- Elevated1.5%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Below the national average55.7%
- Wind turbines within 3 kmⓘ
- Wind farm in the neighbourhood3
- Distance to nearest permitⓘ
- permit nearby84 m
- Distance to play area/playgroundⓘ
- Play area right next door45 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot84 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average31%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space130 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)165 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential9,408 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,038 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
14 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
49th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 282 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
14th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
15th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
34th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 290 pupils
Disadvantage score 32: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 410 pupils
Disadvantage score 95: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
20th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 338 pupils
Disadvantage score 83: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
48th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
44th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 41% of schools
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
4th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 249 exam candidates
97th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO · 97 exam candidates
44th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 140 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
80th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 72 exam candidates
83rd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 15 exam candidates
40th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
31st percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 63 exam candidates
82nd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.