Price drops in and around Amersfoort
More homes in and around Amersfoort whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Trekvogelweg 77
Apartment at Trekvogelweg 77 in Amersfoort (Watervogelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1968 and has 61 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Amersfoort Schothorst (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool De Kinderhof (479 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer17 Jul 2026
- Price reduced25 Jun 2026€ 296,000−€ 14,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 310,000
Property details
- Living area
- 61 m²
- Construction year
- 1968
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 306,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Watervogelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated95 persons
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,265 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical530 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.463 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away45.6 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)10.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
16 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 256 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 257 pupils
Disadvantage score 92 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 410 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 289 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 54% of schools
24th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 169 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
41st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
32nd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
41st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 139 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 58 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.