Price drops in and around Voorburg
More homes in and around Voorburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
van Naeltwijckstraat 82
Terraced house at van Naeltwijckstraat 82 in Voorburg (Voorburg Noord noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 107 m² of living space, a 221 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Laan van NOI (275 m). The nearest primary school is De Parachute (402 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)6 Jul 2026
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 419,000−€ 46,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 465,000
Property details
- Living area
- 107 m²
- Plot
- 221 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 554,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Voorburg Noord noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)354 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby11
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot116 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space105 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,575 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,027 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.889 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away39.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
26 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 419 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
no recent test score · total 62 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 7% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 119 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 72 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 625 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
52nd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.