Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
van Stein Callenfelsstr 25
Apartment at van Stein Callenfelsstraat 25 in Rijswijk (Te Werve neighbourhood). The home was built in 1960 and has 100 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Godfried Bomansschool (378 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 275,000−€ 14,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 289,500
Property details
- Living area
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 1960
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 266,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Te Werve, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated145 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share21%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High18%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,206 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 m³
- Average WOZ 100m-block
- above average price level402 EUR (x1000)
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.876 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away38 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
44th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.