Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
W.A. Vultostraat 81
Terraced house at W.A. Vultostraat 81 in Utrecht (Oud Hoograven-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1936 and has 103 m² of living space, a 115 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Vaartsche Rijn (897 m). The nearest primary school is KBS St. Jan de Doper (231 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 700,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale30 Jun 2026€ 725,000
Property details
- Living area
- 103 m²
- Plot
- 115 m²
- Construction year
- 1936
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 746,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud Hoograven-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Noise load
- Loud66 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive57 dB
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41.3%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity72
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels42%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space76 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,336 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield999 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
72 construction plans within 500 m · 40 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 509 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
98th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
14th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 270 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.