Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Weeresteinhof 15
Terraced house at Weeresteinhof 15 in Utrecht (Queeckhovenplein en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 2017 and has 123 m² of living space, a 116 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Zuilen (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool de Cirkel (407 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)13 Jul 2026
- Under offer7 Jul 2026
- Relisted22 Jun 2026€ 689,000−€ 36,000
- Listed for sale10 Jun 2026€ 725,000
Property details
- Living area
- 123 m²
- Plot
- 116 m²
- Construction year
- 2017
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 803,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Queeckhovenplein en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside36.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors40.1%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental61%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential arearesidential area
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels93%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space104 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical640 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,176 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
63rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
31st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 358 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 622 pupils
Disadvantage score 154 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 159 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
39th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
11th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 142 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 258 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.