Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
3e Louise de Colignystraat 152
Terraced house at 3e Louise de Colignystraat 152 in 's-Gravenhage (Bezuidenhout-Midden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1914 and has 123 m² of living space, a 176 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Laan van NOI (308 m). The nearest primary school is Liduina (247 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted19 Jun 2026€ 495,000−€ 30,000
- Price reduced6 Jun 2026€ 525,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 123 m²
- Plot
- 176 m²
- Construction year
- 1914
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 490,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bezuidenhout-Midden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby9
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime124 per 1,000 residents
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot53 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space119 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential8,546 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,027 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.865 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
48 permits · 6 construction plans within 500 m · 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 419 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
no recent test score · total 62 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 7% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 503 pupils
Disadvantage score 83 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
52nd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
61st percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.