Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Alberdingk Thijmstraat 29 B
Apartment at Alberdingk Thijmstraat 29 in Utrecht (Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 2005 and has 62 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Graadt van Roggenweg (734 m). The nearest primary school is KBS De Catharijnepoort (61 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jul 2026€ 365,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 62 m²
- Construction year
- 2005
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 388,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors32.7%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)159 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.652 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away39.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)7.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 39 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
78th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 157 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 201 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 80 pupils · total 535 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 81 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 191 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 254 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
33rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 185 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 168 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
45th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 61 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.