Price drops in and around Breda
More homes in and around Breda whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Antwerpenstraat 308
Apartment at Antwerpenstraat 308 in Breda (Biesdonk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1965 and has 77 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Breda (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Kbs John F Kennedy (236 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted15 Jul 2026€ 295,000−€ 13,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 308,000
Property details
- Living area
- 77 m²
- Construction year
- 1965
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 253,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Biesdonk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions6,149 kg/m2/yr
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.1%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,857.2 mol/ha/yr
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby8
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,524 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical100 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.785 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away16.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)12.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 48 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
48th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 371 pupils
Disadvantage score 114 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 181 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 228 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
41st percentile — average · AMN · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
24th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 144 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
95th percentile — high · AMN · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 441 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 586 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
46th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 275 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
67th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 127 exam candidates
53rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 230 exam candidates
42nd percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 22 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 131 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.