Price drops in and around Bergen op Zoom
More homes in and around Bergen op Zoom whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Antwerpsestraatweg 85
Semi-detached at Antwerpsestraatweg 85 in Bergen op Zoom (Het Glacis neighbourhood). The home was built in 1905 and has 184 m² of living space, a 119 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Bergen op Zoom (994 m). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool Octopus (601 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)13 Jul 2026
- Under offer7 Jul 2026
- Price reduced10 Jun 2026€ 295,000−€ 44,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 339,000
Property details
- Living area
- 184 m²
- Plot
- 119 m²
- Construction year
- 1905
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 310,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Het Glacis, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition3,349.6 mol/ha/yr
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.1%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity83
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space110 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,940 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,029 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.054 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away12.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 83 construction plans within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
63rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 256 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 18% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 305 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 219 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 101 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 91 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
24th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 428 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
10th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VWO · 49 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 25 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.