Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Beatrixhof 9
Terraced house at Beatrixhof 9 in Tilburg (Nassaubuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1951 and has 84 m² of living space, a 115 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Tilburg Universiteit (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Vijf Hoeven (191 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)16 Jul 2026
- Relisted20 Jun 2026€ 365,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 84 m²
- Plot
- 115 m²
- Construction year
- 1951
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 347,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nassaubuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable12%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby24
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby13
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.5%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot52 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels45%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space60 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical720 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,181 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 15 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
41st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
28th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 515 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
54th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 157 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 273 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 592 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
46th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
17th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.