Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Beetsstraat 315
Terraced house at Beetsstraat 315 in 's-Gravenhage (Spoorwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 60 m² of living space, a 119 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (482 m). The nearest primary school is De Spoorzoeker (99 m).
Price & status history
- For sale10 Jul 2026
- Price reduced10 Jul 2026€ 285,000−€ 4,500
- Under offer29 Jun 2026
- Relisted18 Jun 2026€ 289,500−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 299,500
Property details
- Living area
- 60 m²
- Plot
- 119 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 241,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Spoorwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors44.4%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- Predominantly social rental56%
- Number of building plans within 500 mⓘ
- Much building activity109
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space107 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical450 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential7,705 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,026 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.822 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 109 construction plans within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
7th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 89 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 139 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.