Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Aalbersestraat 242 G
Apartment at Aalbersestraat 242 in Amsterdam (Dudokbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1956 and has 87 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (2.6 km). The nearest primary school is Goeman Borgesiusschool (245 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jul 2026β¬ 375,000ββ¬ 25,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026β¬ 400,000
Property details
- Living area
- 87 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1956
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- β¬ 423,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Dudokbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated COβ emissions
- High emissions5,039 kg/m2/yr
- Share of social assistance recipients
- High8.4%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty11.9%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated230 persons
- Liveability class
- Poorgrossly inadequate
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.3129 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.182 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1377 score
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental70%
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.8 km
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)4%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)69.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)64.5%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure7
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby28
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.6%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Wind turbines within 3 km
- Many wind turbines nearby9
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater17 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Leasehold or freehold
- LeaseholdYes
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average⬠575,000
- Distance to airport
- Nearby8.2 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- High flight nuisance14.3%
- Noise load
- Heavy61 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated6.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot8,487 mΒ²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical380 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOβ
- Very low0.678 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.5 km
- Distance to arable crop
- Far away (>250 m)2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits within 500 m Β· 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
4th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 29 pupils Β· total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 42: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
44th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 59 pupils Β· total 375 pupils
Disadvantage score 79: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
25th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 56 pupils Β· total 440 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
58th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 93 pupils Β· total 591 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
29th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 15 pupils Β· total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 40% of schools
10th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 14 pupils Β· total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 36: more disadvantage than 76% of schools
40th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 117: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
60th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 61% of schools
2nd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
70th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 52 pupils Β· total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
no exam results Β· PRO
0th percentile: low Β· 52% passed Β· CE avg 5.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 33 exam candidates
35th percentile: average Β· 93% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO Β· 93 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile: low Β· 61% passed Β· CE avg 5.5 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 89 exam candidates
56th percentile: average Β· 94% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 97 exam candidates
3rd percentile: low Β· 75% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 299 exam candidates
5th percentile: low Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 138 exam candidates
0th percentile: low Β· 59% passed Β· CE avg 5.6 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 29 exam candidates
78th percentile: high Β· 98% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO Β· 58 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.