Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29/07/2026 | Ferdinand Bolstraat 123 C Amsterdam | β¬ 435.000 β¬ 400.000 | -8.1% | 51 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Donau 122 Amstelveen | β¬ 565.000 β¬ 549.000 | -2.8% | 97 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Aalbersestraat 242 G Amsterdam | β¬ 400.000 β¬ 375.000 | -6.3% | 87 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Oeverpad 280 Amsterdam | β¬ 445.000 β¬ 425.000 | -4.5% | 97 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Kloosterstraat 27 Duivendrecht | β¬ 1.145.000 β¬ 1.095.000 | -4.4% | 216 mΒ²159 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Kleiburg 818 Amsterdam | β¬ 350.000 β¬ 339.000 | -3.1% | 68 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Bos en Lommerplein 82 Amsterdam | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 525.000 | -4.5% | 80 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Rosmolenstraat 36 A Zaandam | β¬ 499.000 β¬ 449.000 | -10.0% | 85 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Hornweg 212 Aalsmeer | β¬ 1.250.000 β¬ 1.195.000 | -4.4% | 240 mΒ²1548 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 123 1 Amsterdam | β¬ 395.000 β¬ 365.000 | -7.6% | 50 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Falckstraat 31 H Amsterdam | β¬ 2.650.000 β¬ 2.495.000 | -5.8% | 188 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Van Suchtelen van de Haarestraat 83 Amsterdam | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 525.000 | -4.5% | 91 mΒ² | |||
25/07/2026 | Millingenhof 344 Amsterdam | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 369.000 | -1.6% | 89 mΒ² | |||
25/07/2026 | Cruquiuskade 5 Amsterdam | β¬ 1.145.000 β¬ 1.095.000 | -4.4% | 126 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Baerlestraat 1 3A Amsterdam | β¬ 850.000 β¬ 800.000 | -5.9% | 87 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Korte Ouderkerkerdijk 1 X2 Amsterdam | β¬ 4.500.000 β¬ 4.450.000 | -1.1% | 334 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zuider IJdijk 127 Amsterdam | β¬ 725.000 β¬ 680.000 | -6.2% | 172 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Prinsengracht 215 M Amsterdam | β¬ 469.000 β¬ 449.000 | -4.3% | 40 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zeeburgerdijk 17 3 Amsterdam | β¬ 950.000 β¬ 880.000 | -7.4% | 114 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Ottho Heldringstraat 27 U Amsterdam | β¬ 795.000 β¬ 750.000 | -5.7% | 141 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Oeverpad 280
Apartment at Oeverpad 280 in Amsterdam (Meer en Oever neighbourhood). The home was built in 1998 and has 96 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Postjesweg (1.9 km). The nearest primary school is IKC Het Talent (363 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jul 2026β¬ 425,000ββ¬ 20,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026β¬ 445,000
Property details
- Living area
- 96 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1998
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- β¬ 459,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Meer en Oever, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellβ
- Very densely populated170 persons
- Liveability classβ
- Weakweak
- Liveability scoreβ
- clearly below average-0.1547 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyβ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1112 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)β
- Low (bottom quarter)2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.2%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)β
- Much building pressure10
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)β
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress45 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)β
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Within PR 10β»βΆ risk contourβ
- Within risk contourYes
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)β
- Significant ground subsidence-8.7 mm/yr
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)β
- Very high groundwater17 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)β
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Shared plotβ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerβ
- Few solar panels2%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)β
- Above national average⬠575,000
- Distance to airportβ
- Nearby6.8 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)β
- High flight nuisance10.8%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)β
- Elevated1.5%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facilityβ
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- Under flight path / in aviation noise zoneβ
- In air traffic noise zoneYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)β
- Elevated2.87 Β΅g/kg
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Leasehold or freeholdβ
- FreeholdNo
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)β
- Very generous plot3,258 mΒ²
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Efficient (label A/B)167 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionβ
- Economical490 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOββ
- Very low0.647 Β΅g/mΒ³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits within 500 m Β· 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
2nd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
41st percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 38 pupils Β· total 314 pupils
Disadvantage score 50: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
50th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 67 pupils Β· total 418 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
17th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
58th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 93 pupils Β· total 591 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
22nd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 65 pupils Β· total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
11th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 21 pupils Β· total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
10th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 33 pupils Β· total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
43rd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
23rd percentile: low Β· DIA Β· grade 8: 46 pupils Β· total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 8% of schools
3rd percentile: low Β· 75% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 299 exam candidates
56th percentile: average Β· 94% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 97 exam candidates
5th percentile: low Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 138 exam candidates
78th percentile: high Β· 98% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO Β· 58 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
35th percentile: average Β· 93% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO Β· 93 exam candidates
66th percentile: average Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 68 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile: low Β· 59% passed Β· CE avg 5.6 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 29 exam candidates
0th percentile: low Β· 52% passed Β· CE avg 5.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 33 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.