Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Brinckerinckstraat 32
Apartment at Brinckerinckstraat 32 in 's-Gravenhage (Moerwijk-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1939 and has 135 m² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (494 m). The nearest primary school is De Kleine Wereld (179 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jun 2026€ 365,000−€ 4,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 369,000
Property details
- Living area
- 135 m²
- Construction year
- 1939
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 360,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Moerwijk-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors33.7%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High21.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.871 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away40.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)44.9 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.5 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)6.1 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away4,321 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
18 permits within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 139 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
7th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 263 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.