Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester Elsenlaan 323 F109
Apartment at Burgemeester Elsenlaan 323 in Rijswijk (Plaspoelpolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 1991 and has 80 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Godfried Bomansschool (454 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced29 Jul 2026€ 470,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 485,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 1991
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 485,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Plaspoelpolder, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty13.9%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime242 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure7
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk7.7%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable49%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels5%
- Distance to airport
- Nearby11.9 km
- Noise load
- Heavy63 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing54 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.3%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,260 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions14 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)59 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical500 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.876 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
65th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
40th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
62nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
38th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
83rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 66: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 607 pupils
Disadvantage score 125: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
44th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
75th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.