Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Frijdastraat 31
Terraced house at Frijdastraat 31 in Rijswijk (Plaspoelpolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 1964 and has 141 m² of living space, a 102 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (727 m). The nearest primary school is CBS Melodie (817 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 500,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 141 m²
- Plot
- 102 m²
- Construction year
- 1964
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 432,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Plaspoelpolder, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable10%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty13.9%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime242 per 1,000 residents
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)13%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.7%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels5%
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)90 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby11.6 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.3%
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated7.1%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average47.4%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space54 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical500 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,433 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,021 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.949 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
83rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
38th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
65th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
40th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
23rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
62nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
58th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
44th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
75th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
96th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 15 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.