Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Badhuisstraat 21
Terraced house at Badhuisstraat 21 in 's-Gravenhage (Visserijbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1906 and has 142 m² of living space, a 150 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (3.9 km). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool De Vuurtoren (481 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted28 Jul 2026€ 750,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 795,000
Property details
- Living area
- 142 m²
- Plot
- 150 m²
- Construction year
- 1906
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 610,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Visserijbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated170 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.2%
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery5%
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area20
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.68 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure60
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity16
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.62 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up96%
- Unbuilt plot area
- Almost completely built up7 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels7%
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.6 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.2%
- Estimated sun hours (winter)
- Virtually no winter sun0.5 hour
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space113 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential8,246 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,046 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.779 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away45.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)47.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
58 permits within 500 m · 8 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
35th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 150 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
72nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 69 pupils · total 566 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 100 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 445 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
28th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 80: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
99th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 464 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
24th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 142 exam candidates
20th percentile: low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 52 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 22 exam candidates
99th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
77th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.