Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Leeghwaterkade 43
Apartment at Leeghwaterkade 43 in 's-Gravenhage (Laakhaven-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 2004 and has 72 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag HS (219 m). The nearest primary school is Christelijke Basisschool De Ontmoeting (573 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 72 m²
- Construction year
- 2004
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 290,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Laakhaven-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes68.4%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High20.8%
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1796 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2435 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1149 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share24.3%
- Net labour participation
- Low60%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.7%
- High stress (neighbourhood)
- Much stress31.1%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental67%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area21
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime116.2 per 1,000 residents
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)24%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)77.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)64.9%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure7
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside32.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.2%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby9
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources6
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby5
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.56 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels0%
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)80 m
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.2 km
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway131 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby14.6 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot549 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions20 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)106 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical270 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.879 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away40 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
2nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 72 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
no recent test score · total 119 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 74: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
20th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 98: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
32nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
4th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 108: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
75th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
52nd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.