Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Stavangerstraat 84
Semi-detached at Stavangerstraat 84 in 's-Gravenhage (Hoge Veld neighbourhood). The home was built in 2009 and has 146 m² of living space, a 242 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (2.9 km). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool De Fontein (437 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced28 Jul 2026€ 675,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 695,000
Property details
- Living area
- 146 m²
- Plot
- 242 m²
- Construction year
- 2009
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 675,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoge Veld, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated135 persons
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.3%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.5 ratio
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.2%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)132,639 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.69 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Distance to airport
- Nearby13.5 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Many greenhouses nearby13.27 ha
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.8 °C
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average56.7%
- Follow-up soil action required
- Further action neededYes
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work31.2%· NL 27%
- Distance to play area/playground
- Play area right next door57 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot166 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average33%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space119 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)150 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical140 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential8,623 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 807 pupils
Disadvantage score 112: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
68th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 11% of schools
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 488 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 1% of schools
96th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 644 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 3% of schools
70th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 97: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
31st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 238 pupils
Disadvantage score 87: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
2nd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
78th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
49th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
7th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.