Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27/07/2026 | Frijdastraat 31 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 525.000 € 500.000 | -4.8% | 123 m²102 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Wilhelminastraat 53 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 350.000 | -9.1% | 85 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Willem Beukelszoonstraat 24 Den Haag | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 127 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Pieter van den Zandestraat 11 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 70 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Marcelisstraat 48 Den Haag | € 675.000 € 595.000 | -11.8% | 146 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Burgemeester Patijnlaan 790 Den Haag | € 485.000 € 425.000 | -12.4% | 69 m² | |||
26/07/2026 | Alexander Gogelweg 69 Den Haag | € 995.000 € 925.000 | -7.0% | 195 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Statenlaan 146 Den Haag | € 700.000 € 650.000 | -7.1% | 163 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Juliana van Stolberglaan 372 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 83 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Brabantse Turfmarkt 26 Delft | € 895.000 € 845.000 | -5.6% | 194 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Vlamingstraat 36 B Den Haag | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 72 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Westduinweg 54 A Den Haag | € 435.000 € 395.000 | -9.2% | 81 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Alkemadelaan 70 Den Haag | € 1.245.000 € 1.190.000 | -4.4% | 233 m²191 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zwetstraat 60 Den Haag | € 260.000 € 250.000 | -3.9% | 50 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Thomsonlaan 206 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 122 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Rijswijkseweg 71 C Den Haag | € 369.000 € 349.000 | -5.4% | 94 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Zwartendijk 29 Monster | € 1.129.000 € 1.095.000 | -3.0% | 236 m²1015 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Pisuissestraat 75 Den Haag | € 420.000 € 400.000 | -4.8% | 112 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Louis Couperusplein 52 Den Haag | € 840.000 € 829.500 | -1.3% | 153 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Volmerlaan 4 F035 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 309.500 € 300.000 | -3.1% | 53 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Wilhelminastraat 53
Apartment at Wilhelminastraat 53 in 's-Gravenhage (Bezuidenhout-Midden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1958 and has 85 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Beatrixkwartier (486 m). The nearest primary school is Dr M M Den Hertogschool voor Christelijk Basis Onderwijs (336 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 350,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale15 Jul 2026€ 385,000
Property details
- Living area
- 85 m²
- Construction year
- 1958
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 385,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bezuidenhout-Midden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated210 persons
- Catering within 300 mⓘ
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area21
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime124 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.1%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure38
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity7
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby7
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.03 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels10%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)871 m
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site1.1 km
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Noise loadⓘ
- Heavy61 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing52 dB
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)ⓘ
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot1,346 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.883 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away40.8 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)47.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)3.9 km
- Distance to sprayed cropⓘ
- Far away (>250 m)1.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
37 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
52nd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 419 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 45% of schools
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 429 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
32nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
96th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 220 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
44th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 72% of schools
84th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
22nd percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
95th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
98th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
68th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.