Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dedemsvaartweg 279
Apartment at Dedemsvaartweg 279 in 's-Gravenhage (Zijden, Steden en Zichten neighbourhood). The home was built in 1993 and has 94 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (2.9 km). The nearest primary school is De Drentse Hoek (234 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 380,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 400,000
Property details
- Living area
- 94 m²
- Construction year
- 1993
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 355,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zijden, Steden en Zichten, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.9%
- Noise load
- Loud68 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,459 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)116 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.876 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)45.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
81st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
24th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 330 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
25th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 111 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
46th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 462 pupils
Disadvantage score 149 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 339 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.