Price drops in and around Schiedam
More homes in and around Schiedam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gustav Vasaborg 60
Apartment at Gustav Vasaborg 60 in Schiedam (Sveaborg en Sveadal neighbourhood). The home was built in 2005 and has 157 m² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Nieuwland (2.5 km). The nearest primary school is De Violier (316 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced28 Jul 2026€ 595,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 625,000
Property details
- Living area
- 157 m²
- Construction year
- 2005
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 569,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Sveaborg en Sveadal, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated110 persons
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away9.1 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- GPs within 3 km
- Few GPs nearby2
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport3.8 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- Severe flight nuisance28.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-20.2 mm/yr
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway247 m
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Heavy train noise2.4%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.3%
- Under flight path / in aviation noise zone
- In air traffic noise zoneYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Distance to indoor swimming pool
- Further away3.5 km
- Distance to play area/playground
- Play area right next door99 m
- Daily shops within 1 km
- Few convenience shops1
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Some pressure in places1.07 ratio
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,245 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average37%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)119 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.059 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
27th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 355 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 41% of schools
75th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 308 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 271 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 370 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 30% of schools
46th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
65th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 407 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
30th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 92: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 135: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 11% of schools
no exam results · VBO
20th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VWO · 78 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
43rd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
18th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
7th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 62 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
34th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.