Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dr. J. Presserstraat 125
Terraced house at Dr. J. Presserstraat 125 in 's-Gravenhage (Houtwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1982 and has 119 m² of living space, a 146 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (4.1 km). The nearest primary school is KC Koos Meinderts (366 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced13 Jul 2026€ 500,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale26 Jun 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 119 m²
- Plot
- 146 m²
- Construction year
- 1982
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 510,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Houtwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.2 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.83 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.7%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.1%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot96 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space59 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)174 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical710 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,390 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,056 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
25th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 111 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 462 pupils
Disadvantage score 149 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
81st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.