Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dr. J. Presserstraat 337
Semi-detached at Dr. J. Presserstraat 337 in 's-Gravenhage (Houtwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1982 and has 114 m² of living space, a 109 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (3.9 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare basisschool Houtwijk (361 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted15 Jul 2026€ 475,000−€ 14,500
- Listed for sale4 Jun 2026€ 489,500
Property details
- Living area
- 114 m²
- Plot
- 109 m²
- Construction year
- 1982
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 455,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Houtwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.2 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.83 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot53 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space60 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical710 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,415 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,056 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 11 construction plans within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
25th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 111 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 339 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
81st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.