Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Driebergenstraat 162
Apartment at Driebergenstraat 162 in 's-Gravenhage (Leyenburg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1934 and has 69 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (2.4 km). The nearest primary school is Christelijke Basisschool De Ark (364 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)13 Jul 2026
- Under offer9 Jul 2026
- Relisted25 Jun 2026€ 289,500−€ 10,500
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 300,000
Property details
- Living area
- 69 m²
- Construction year
- 1934
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 255,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Leyenburg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.3%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.5%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby6
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.87 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46.2 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
46th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 339 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 255 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
81st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.