Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Erasmusweg 1 D
Apartment at Erasmusweg 1 in 's-Gravenhage (Moerwijk-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1995 and has 42 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (124 m). The nearest primary school is De Kleine Wereld (197 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)18 Jun 2026
- Price reduced5 Jun 2026€ 219,500−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 244,500
Property details
- Living area
- 42 m²
- Construction year
- 1995
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 228,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Moerwijk-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.2%
- Noise load
- Loud66 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.8%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,626 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)164 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.871 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away39.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)44.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
17 permits · 18 construction plans within 500 m · 38 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
7th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 139 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.