Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Fischerstraat 395
Terraced house at Fischerstraat 395 in 's-Gravenhage (Transvaalkwartier-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2004 and has 102 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Het Galjoen (257 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted15 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 102 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 2004
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 385,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Transvaalkwartier-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,332 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions20 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space65 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)103 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,336 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,026 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
14 permits within 500 m · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 263 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 317 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.