Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gaslaan 261
Apartment at Gaslaan 261 in 's-Gravenhage (Rond de Energiecentrale neighbourhood). The home was built in 1938 and has 63 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (1.7 km). The nearest primary school is De Klimop (83 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted7 Jul 2026€ 275,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 300,000
Property details
- Living area
- 63 m²
- Construction year
- 1938
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 315,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rond de Energiecentrale, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)371 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.7%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated150 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot298 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical540 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.86 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away42.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)47.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)6.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
52 permits within 500 m · 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 98 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 125 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 696 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 458 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 129 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
no recent test score · total 36 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.