Price drops in and around Nootdorp
More homes in and around Nootdorp whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gilze-Rijenhof 118
Terraced house at Gilze-Rijenhof 118 in Nootdorp (De Venen Centrum neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 143 m² of living space, a 130 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Ypenburg (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool De Notenkraker (273 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jun 2026€ 619,000−€ 30,000
- For sale10 Jun 2026
- Under offer3 Jun 2026€ 649,000
Property details
- Living area
- 143 m²
- Plot
- 130 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 594,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Venen Centrum, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)219,566 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby21.96 ha
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels49%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space88 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)105 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical90 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,309 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,024 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 461 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 343 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 460 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
55th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
82nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 588 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
50th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 237 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
44th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
84th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 65 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 146 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.