Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Groen van Prinstererlaan 162
Apartment at Groen van Prinstererlaan 162 in 's-Gravenhage (Rosenburg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1960 and has 96 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (4.5 km). The nearest primary school is BaO Aquamarijn (389 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)7 Jul 2026
- Under offer29 Jun 2026
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 300,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 335,000
Property details
- Living area
- 96 m²
- Construction year
- 1960
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 290,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rosenburg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions90 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)472 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby8
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,028 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical580 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.808 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away43.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)47.7 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 420 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 176 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 456 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
18th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.