Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hart van Brabantlaan 127
Terraced house at Hart van Brabantlaan 127 in Tilburg (VGL-terrein neighbourhood). The home was built in 1936 and has 122 m² of living space, a 136 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (768 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool De Vuurvogel (312 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced12 Jun 2026€ 399,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 415,000
Property details
- Living area
- 122 m²
- Plot
- 136 m²
- Construction year
- 1936
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 443,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in VGL-terrein, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.7%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive57 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby20
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,766 mol/ha/yr
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space87 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical130 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,032 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 273 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 592 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 157 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
90th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
41st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 515 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
28th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 67 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 288 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 184 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.