Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hilversumsestraat 8 C
Apartment at Hilversumsestraat 8 in 's-Gravenhage (Rustenburg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1996 and has 84 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (2.5 km). The nearest primary school is P.C. Hooft-School (151 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jun 2026€ 370,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 395,000
Property details
- Living area
- 84 m²
- Construction year
- 1996
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 375,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rustenburg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,623 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)131 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.856 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away42.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 255 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 392 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 98 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
72nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 125 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.