Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hoefkade 1590
Apartment at Hoefkade 1590 in 's-Gravenhage (Groente- en Fruitmarkt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1937 and has 82 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Chr Basisschool Comenius (154 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 239,500−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 259,500
Property details
- Living area
- 82 m²
- Construction year
- 1937
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 231,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Groente- en Fruitmarkt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.4%
- Noise load
- Loud70 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive61 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.771 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away40.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)45.7 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)6.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 605 pupils
Disadvantage score 143 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 392 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.