Price drops in and around Kaatsheuvel
More homes in and around Kaatsheuvel whose asking price was recently cut.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Hoofdstraat 81 D
Apartment at Hoofdstraat 81 in Kaatsheuvel (Centrum neighbourhood). The home was built in 2002 and has 115 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Tilburg Reeshof (10.2 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Den Bussel (927 m).
Know first, then bid.
Price & status history
- Relisted12 days ago€ 539,000−€ 11,000
- Sold (conditional)3 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Features
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits within 500 m · 195 construction plans within 1 km · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
45th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
41st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 277 pupils
Disadvantage score 18: more disadvantage than 57% of schools
55th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 35% of schools
91st percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 9% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 206 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 14% of schools
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 73 pupils · total 487 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
45th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 373 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · AMN · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 289 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 75 pupils
Disadvantage score 21: more disadvantage than 61% of schools
40th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 85 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
42nd percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
92nd percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 142 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 197 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.