Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jan Evertsenstraat 35
Terraced house at Jan Evertsenstraat 35 in Tilburg (Zeeheldenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1964 and has 103 m² of living space, a 186 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Triangel (385 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 395,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale13 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 103 m²
- Plot
- 186 m²
- Construction year
- 1964
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 397,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zeeheldenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated130 persons
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.7%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby9
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,766 mol/ha/yr
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.1%
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot254 m above sea level
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up71%
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away11.3 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.1%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- Borders overburden Natura 2000 area
- Borders congested areaYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.77 µg/kg
- Nitrogen restrictions for permits nearby
- Nitrogen restrictions nearbyYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot55 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average27%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space153 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential10,606 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 46 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
33rd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 96: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
62nd percentile: average · AMN · grade 8: 96 pupils · total 606 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 41% of schools
38th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 138 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
72nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 326 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 592 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 276 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
28th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 67: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 273 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 5% of schools
40th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
no recent test score
89th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
23rd percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 288 exam candidates
35th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 184 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 148 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
52nd percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
46th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.