Price drops in and around Wateringen
More homes in and around Wateringen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kantstijl 34
Apartment at Kantstijl 34 in Wateringen (Suydervelt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1990 and has 74 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (3.7 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Kijckert (81 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer3 Jul 2026
- Relisted20 Jun 2026€ 375,000−€ 24,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 399,000
Property details
- Living area
- 74 m²
- Construction year
- 1990
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 336,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Suydervelt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)1,381,132 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby138.16 ha
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.9 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.92 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot860 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels42%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical740 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.95 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away39 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 34% of schools
70th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 644 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 807 pupils
Disadvantage score 112 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 350 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
59th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 270 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 238 pupils
Disadvantage score 87 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.