Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28/07/2026 | Kleiburg 818 Amsterdam | β¬ 350.000 β¬ 339.000 | -3.1% | 68 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Bos en Lommerplein 82 Amsterdam | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 525.000 | -4.5% | 80 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Rosmolenstraat 36 A Zaandam | β¬ 499.000 β¬ 449.000 | -10.0% | 85 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Hornweg 212 Aalsmeer | β¬ 1.250.000 β¬ 1.195.000 | -4.4% | 240 mΒ²1548 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 123 1 Amsterdam | β¬ 395.000 β¬ 365.000 | -7.6% | 50 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Falckstraat 31 H Amsterdam | β¬ 2.650.000 β¬ 2.495.000 | -5.8% | 188 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Van Suchtelen van de Haarestraat 83 Amsterdam | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 525.000 | -4.5% | 91 mΒ² | |||
25/07/2026 | Millingenhof 344 Amsterdam | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 369.000 | -1.6% | 89 mΒ² | |||
25/07/2026 | Cruquiuskade 5 Amsterdam | β¬ 1.145.000 β¬ 1.095.000 | -4.4% | 126 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Baerlestraat 1 3A Amsterdam | β¬ 850.000 β¬ 800.000 | -5.9% | 87 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Korte Ouderkerkerdijk 1 X2 Amsterdam | β¬ 4.500.000 β¬ 4.450.000 | -1.1% | 334 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zuider IJdijk 127 Amsterdam | β¬ 725.000 β¬ 680.000 | -6.2% | 172 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Prinsengracht 215 M Amsterdam | β¬ 469.000 β¬ 449.000 | -4.3% | 40 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zeeburgerdijk 17 3 Amsterdam | β¬ 950.000 β¬ 880.000 | -7.4% | 114 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Ottho Heldringstraat 27 U Amsterdam | β¬ 795.000 β¬ 750.000 | -5.7% | 141 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Silodam 447 Amsterdam | β¬ 700.000 β¬ 670.000 | -4.3% | 86 mΒ² | |||
23/07/2026 | Leibnizstraat 22 Amsterdam | β¬ 675.000 β¬ 650.000 | -3.7% | 117 mΒ²112 mΒ² | |||
23/07/2026 | Haarlemmerweg 577 2 Amsterdam | β¬ 500.000 β¬ 475.000 | -5.0% | 75 mΒ² | |||
23/07/2026 | Overschiestraat 17 D3 Amsterdam | β¬ 399.000 β¬ 375.000 | -6.0% | 61 mΒ² | |||
23/07/2026 | Overschiestraat 17 C3 Amsterdam | β¬ 399.000 β¬ 375.000 | -6.0% | 60 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kleiburg 818
Apartment at Kleiburg 818 in Amsterdam (Bijlmermuseum-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 68 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Kraaiennest (233 m). The nearest primary school is Samenspel (503 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced28 Jul 2026β¬ 339,000ββ¬ 11,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026β¬ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 68 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- β¬ 356,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bijlmermuseum-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of persons in povertyβ
- High poverty10.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cellβ
- Very densely populated165 persons
- Liveability classβ
- Inadequateinsufficient
- Liveability scoreβ
- clearly below average-0.3878 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyβ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2159 score
- Livability Meter: housing stockβ
- Clearly below average-0.1659 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)β
- Low (bottom quarter)21%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)68.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)β
- Much building pressure6
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)β
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)β
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress43 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the homeβ
- Few people find cooling outside37.8%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyβ
- Few people can cool off indoors37.6%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)β
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)β
- Very high groundwater17 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)β
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)β
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.13 m
- Flood risk classβ
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designationβ
- Cultural-historical valueValue - Cultural heritage
- Shared plotβ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerβ
- Few solar panels1%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)β
- Above national average⬠575,000
- Distance to airportβ
- Nearby14.6 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)β
- High flight nuisance11.7%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)β
- Elevated1.5%
- Under flight path / in aviation noise zoneβ
- In air traffic noise zoneYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectβ
- Noticeably warmer1.1 Β°C
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Leasehold or freeholdβ
- FreeholdNo
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)β
- Very generous plot1,510 mΒ²
- Calculated COβ emissionsβ
- Low emissions11 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Efficient (label A/B)46 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionβ
- Economical60 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m Β· 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
21st percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 62 pupils Β· total 511 pupils
Disadvantage score 168: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
52nd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 18 pupils Β· total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
3rd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 37 pupils Β· total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
19th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 43 pupils Β· total 454 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
10th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
6th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
5th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 20 pupils Β· total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 35 pupils Β· total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
77th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 38 pupils Β· total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
4th percentile: low Β· 81% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 282 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low Β· 79% passed Β· CE avg 5.8 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 33 exam candidates
no exam results Β· HAVO/VWO
25th percentile: low Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.1 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 38 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
1st percentile: low Β· 69% passed Β· CE avg 5.9 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 118 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
6th percentile: low Β· 86% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 7 exam candidates
39th percentile: average Β· 90% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 271 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low Β· 76% passed Β· CE avg 5.9 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 130 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.