Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kreutzerstraat 40
Semi-detached at Kreutzerstraat 40 in Tilburg (Lijnse Hoek Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1974 and has 152 m² of living space, a 143 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Den Hazennest (723 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)3 Jul 2026
- Under offer22 Jun 2026
- Relisted8 Jun 2026€ 395,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 152 m²
- Plot
- 143 m²
- Construction year
- 1974
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 363,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lijnse Hoek Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable13%
- Distance to nearest emission source
- very nearby239 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby22
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby13
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.2%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental65%
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.107 score
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot58 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space71 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical440 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,653 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.764 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
65th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 416 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 81 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 317 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
41st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
90th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
17th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
46th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
52nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.