Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lage Zand 364
Apartment at Lage Zand 364 in 's-Gravenhage (Uilebomen neighbourhood). The home was built in 2011 and has 119 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Centraal (343 m). The nearest primary school is Jan V Nassauschool voor Protestants Christelijk Basisonderwijs (556 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted13 Jul 2026€ 698,000−€ 42,000
- Listed for sale31 May 2026€ 740,000
Property details
- Living area
- 119 m²
- Construction year
- 2011
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 700,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Uilebomen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to military terrain
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.3 km
- Noise load
- Loud66 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.2%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,357 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical210 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.902 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away40.9 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
36 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 108 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
52nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 705 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 419 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 98 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
38th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
22nd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
61st percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.