Price drops in and around Haarlem
More homes in and around Haarlem whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Liechtensteinhof 2
Terraced house at Liechtensteinhof 2 in Haarlem (Stedenbuurt-oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1988 and has 114 m² of living space, a 143 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Heemstede-Aerdenhout (2.9 km). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool Mgr Huibers (497 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 550,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 565,000
Property details
- Living area
- 114 m²
- Plot
- 143 m²
- Construction year
- 1988
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 529,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stedenbuurt-oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside43.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.8%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental64%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2091 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1388 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space77 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,572 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,029 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 9 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 243 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
29th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 104 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
35th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 167 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
no exam results · HAVO
no exam results · PRO
94th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 203 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 77 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
24th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 212 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.